curious occurred during an experiment conducted by researchers who were preparing to search for hidden chambers in the pyramid using sound waves, arranged so that issuers waves passing through stones found no cameras to record possible, but what happened was that when these waves hit the rocks and did not cross if they were absorbed by them. The researchers did not explain why, analyzed and found stones that contained an amount of water far greater than any natural stone and that being so, waves were absorbed. There are many evidences showing that the civilization that built the Great Pyramid, had knowledge of an impressive technology. The pyramid of Cheops, was originally covered with polished granite plates 27,000, but in the thirteenth century, an earthquake virtually destroyed the city, then the Egyptians hand made the lining of the pyramid to use it to build the city of Cairo. Softening of stones, made or natural, which is known is that the explanations given by archaeologists do not convince people who know the research on that civilization, archeology insists that the pyramids were tombs, nothing else far from the truth, as surveyed in the 108 pyramids in Egypt, was not found in any of them no mummy, not having been sacked as the archaeologists tell us, since some of them were inviolate and empty sarcophagi. Only twice were found in a woman's body, but it was the Roman era, and in another, the body of a child. The pyramid of Khufu, supposedly was his grave, but never found anything to prove that Cheops there, only a stone statuette of 15 cm was all that was found of it, only an insignificant small statue. The construction of the pyramids, their actions, their orientation and technology skills were so advanced that the Egyptian priestly caste had in the earliest dynasties, to give you an idea of \u200b\u200bsuch technology, the polished granite slabs that covered the Great Pyramid, had been polished with high precision machines, also by way of example The polish is compared to that held in the main lens of the telescope at Mount Palomar observatory, and moreover, were no less that 27,000 polished granite slabs, how? With what equipment? With that we conclude that, if so, how they knew these techniques and devices such precision possessed a civilization that knew only according to archeology and copper tools used? These are just some of the many evidences which exist to completely collapse theories that archeology is determined to maintain. The stone blocks of the Egyptian pyramids are man-made items made by José Manuel Delgado http://piramidologia.com extracted from orthodox explanations on the construction of the Egyptian pyramids, especially attributed to the pharaoh Cheops, at present have no consistency. Studies and further research, archaeologists silenced by more conservative and traditional, in addition come really surprising conclusions: the ancient Egyptians knew a technique that allowed "Manufacture" artificial stones. Stones we see today millimeter integrated with each other in the great pharaonic constructs. For many the issue is not the slightest doubt: the pharaoh Khufu reigned for 23 years, twenty of which were devoted to the construction of the largest monument ever built man. This idea comes from the narration in the new books of history written by Herodotus: "... As for the pyramid, spent twenty years building ...". Twenty years so that makes 7 000, those workers in the Copper was high, with astonishing precision, about two million six hundred thousand blocks of stone that, on average, each weighs 2 tons. That is, each year were placed 130,000, which account for 360 per day. If we make an estimate for the working hours for workers at the time of 12 hours, the result is that for 20 years, without knowing the iron and the wheel, the architect of the Great Pyramid organized a team capable of selecting the stone quarry, cut the block, transported several miles, crossing the Nile, hoisted hundreds of feet and put millimeter, all in a record time of 120 seconds! per block. That is, according to orthodox explanations, those artisans! so close to the Paleolithic, embedded twenty years each block two minutes. Neither more nor less. Jomard engineer of the French expedition of Bonaparte, later on corroborated evidence by archaeologist Lauer, estimated that during the past 1,500 years of classical Egyptian history, for the New Kingdom and Ptolemaic period subsequent dynasties, 4,000,000 were used to cubic meters of stone. This amount of rock, which is the most impressive collection of monuments of antiquity, seems minuscule when compared to the works in the Old Kingdom. Only the Great Pyramid is 2,000,000 cubic meters of stone, much like its neighboring pyramid of Khafre. That is, they would have us believe that in 20 years the workers of Cheops built half of what they did then their colleagues for 1,500 years. The problem of weight and volume must be added the enigma posed by the machines used in transportation and the rise of blocks from the quarry to the site. In this case the words of Herodotus are not taken into account as it states that mechanisms used, and iron in construction. The archaeologists, who both rely on their words to date the Great Pyramid, ignore these others. And they were right because they have found no traces of such machines. Again, papyri, stelae and murals were found hieroglyphics explaining how they were transported and hoisted the masses of stone. In a relief of EI-Bershad, of the XII Dynasty, is how a group of 172 people dragging the statue of Djejutijotep, 60 tons, resting on a sled. This coupled with the discovery of several ramps linking the Nile to the bottom of some pyramids, archeology leads to the hypothesis that only accepts: muscular strength. And while this approach may be valid for blocks of 2 to 6 tons can not imagine 30,000 men pulling together one of the many blocks that exist in Egypt of 1,000 tons or more. Let alone raising it by 30 percent slopes. Many hypotheses have been considered. Alien spaceships, brain power, teleportation, infrasound and other more colorful that attempt to explain how they did in ancient Egypt to transport the monoliths. But there is one that, although it seems the result of fantasy, its credibility is supported by findings and recent studies. To the amazement of modern humans and their technology the ancient Egyptians knew techniques to soften the stone! There is sufficient evidence to think that the builders of the Old Kingdom were not masons, but alchemists. In 1988, U.S. published a book entitled The Pyramids, An Enigma Solved It set out a scientific research to speculations anything suspicious. Dr. Joseph Davidovits, geopolymers founder of the Institute of Paris, professor at the University of Toronto and director of the Institute for Applied Archaeological Sciences from Barry University in Florida, with Dr. Margie Morris, University of Minnesota, showed that the analysis revealed chemical and microscopic made in rocks of the plateau of Giza. Along with the detailed reports published several photographs that you can appreciate the presence of hair, nails, fiber and air bubbles in the structure of the limestone of the Great Pyramid. These findings sowed confusion in academia, of course, tried to relegate them to ostracism. In Spain had the opportunity to attend some time to a debate on the key, where José Luis Balbin had the wisdom to invite representatives of both trends. Peter Tompkins suggested to then-director of excavations at the Giza Plateau, Dr. Hawass, a public experiment to demonstrate or discard it once and for all maintained by Davidovits, who was considered capable of making stones similar to those of the Great Pyramid. Hawass's response was not very bright "if you know the Tura quarries and Mokhatam ... why should investigate other issues?". The truth is that this archaeologist ever with his theories could explain what makes a hair of 21 cm in the interior of a limestone back 50 million years, from the Eocene geologic age, back in the second period of the Tertiary Age. Egypt has not only provided great mysteries, but, with them, provides solutions that are sometimes even more enigmatic. The track Davidovits theory is in a commemorative stele Sehel Island near Aswan. It was discovered in 1889 by the Egyptologist Charles Wilbour and finished decoding by the French archaeologist Barquet in 1935. Famine Stela, as it is called, consists of 2,600 glyphs arranged in 32 columns. Although it is assumed to have been sculpted in Ptolemaic times (300 BC) is meant to be copies of most documents old because it deals with matters related to characters of the Third Dynasty. The trail is several different aspects, including: Description of the Famine, visit the Library of Ermoupolis Revelations of Imhotep, Pharaoh Zoser's dream and a Royal Decree. Among the columns between the 6 and 22 are talking about construction methods. In column 11 to 18 Imhotep lists the rocks and minerals in the region of Elephantine. And the columns 18 to 20 describe the dream of Pharaoh Zoser, in which the god Khnum gives the king a list of minerals and chemicals to manufacture agglomerated blocks with which to build temples. If this knowledge is true, you may also later pharaohs were aware of these "revelations" and apply to their own constructions. Something that has always been speculation has been the roller. In many artistic recreations have drawn large monoliths on rollers and pulled by many men. But wood is always scarce in Egypt and had to be of low weight and resistance to traction, not to mention that you need, plus rolls, suitable for the carriage roads that have not yet been found. And even assuming the theory of the rollers, would have required millions. The so-called Palermo Stone shows that Snefru, father of Cheops, a fleet of boats allocated to bring cedar, cypress and conifers from Lebanon. Snefru was the greatest builder of the Fourth Dynasty. Are attributed three pyramids, two in Dahshur (containing 4,000,000 cubic meters of stone) and another in Meidum. Its total construction amounted to 9,000,000 tons of stone used in its 24 year reign. The wood imported from Lebanon could not therefore be used for rollers, or its amount nor its hardness. Although it could be used to make ... MOULDS: Herodotus and seems to confirm this: "... The pyramid was built so that there remain some steps or some call support scales and other shrines. Made from scratch and the bottom, were getting up and climbing the rocks with some machine consists of short beams that raising them from the ground, put them in the first order of steps, from which another machine that he had prevented the rose to the second order, where loads of other similar machine, thus continuing to upload, it seems that few steps were the orders were so in number of machines, or may not be more than an easily transportable, the would moving from step to step each time the discharge of the stone, what good is giving everything several explanations .. . ". The word used by Herodotus and was translated as" machine "is the Greek word" Mechane. "In Greek it is a general term that indicates things invented made. In short! Any type of contraption made with a purpose and therefore should not only be translated by the modern meaning of "machine." Following this approach, replace the word "machine" with the word "mold" and you read the transcript before Herodotus. The thing is consistent in the extreme and were not evidence of any other "machines." Prior to the publication of Davidovits and speculated with the possibility of prefabricated stones of Ancient Egypt. At the Second Congress of Egyptology in 1979 in Grenoble (France) Dr. Klemm, an expert on petrography, advanced the results of their analysis stones of the Great Pyramid. Of the 20 samples studied could not find two that have the same smooth. It seemed that every one came from a different place, with the peculiarity that the consistency was different in areas of the same stone, with greater density at the top than at the bottom. It also found that the rocks of the pyramid contained a higher moisture content which presents the natural stone. His conclusion was clear: the blocks were not natural but artificial. This would explain, on the other hand, what happened in the pyramid of Khafre in September 1968. Dr. Luis Alvarez, Nobel Laureate in Physics, had devised a process for recording cosmic rays pass through the pyramid, through which he hoped to discover hidden cameras. Participating in the event twelve U.S. government agencies and Egypt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment